Husband’s Secret Surveillance on Wife Exposed in Indore Family Court — Ordered to Pay ₹20,000 Monthly Maintenance

---

Indore News | Family Court Drama:
In a shocking case from Indore, the Family Court has exposed a husband’s elaborate ploy to spy on his wife by installing hidden cameras in her bedroom and making his brother act as a “James Bond.” The court not only caught his deceit but also ordered him to pay ₹20,000 per month as maintenance to his estranged wife.

The case involves a woman from Sindhi Colony, Indore, who married a businessman based in Chile around three years ago. Initially, the marriage appeared smooth, but soon after, disputes began surfacing. Matters worsened when the husband allegedly threw the wife out of the house while keeping their child with him, forcing the woman to seek justice in family court.

Fake Employment Claim Exposed

Representing the woman, Advocate K.P. Maheshwari revealed that the wife was subjected to physical and mental abuse. Although the husband had business operations abroad, he falsely claimed in court that he had shut down his overseas ventures and was now working at a transport company in Ulhasnagar for a salary of ₹20,000 per month.

However, the court’s scrutiny exposed his lies. His employment certificate turned out to be fake, and his own admission of spending ₹28,000 monthly on domestic expenses revealed that his actual income ranged between ₹90,000 and ₹1 lakh.

Hidden Cameras and Constant Suspicion

The wife testified that her husband never allowed her to accompany him on foreign trips, raising suspicions about his activities. When she questioned him, he began doubting her character instead. He allegedly installed CCTV cameras throughout the house, including the bedroom, and directed his brother to monitor her every move. These invasive actions led to increasing conflicts between the couple.

Fraud, Assault, and Emotional Trauma

The wife also accused her husband of tricking her with fake visa papers during her first pregnancy, promising to take her abroad but later deceiving her. When she protested, her in-laws allegedly assaulted her, causing a miscarriage. The husband further filed a false theft complaint, resulting in her brief arrest.

Court Cites Supreme Court Guidelines

During the hearing, the husband argued that his wife was financially independent, earning from teaching, beauty services, and property rent — but failed to provide any evidence. The court referred to the Supreme Court’s “Rajnesh vs. Neha” guidelines, which mandate truthful income disclosure under oath. Presenting false information can lead to seven years of imprisonment.

Upon examining his affidavit, the Family Court found inconsistencies and deceit, ordering the husband to pay ₹4 lakh in arrears and a monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 thereafter.

Moral of the Case

This case underscores that deceit and surveillance in relationships not only destroy trust but can have serious legal consequences. The Family Court’s judgment stands as a reminder that the misuse of technology for personal suspicion will not be tolerated under the law.