Supreme Court Takes Strong View on Aravalli Dispute, Pulls Up Rajasthan and Other States

Jaipur/New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday held a crucial hearing on the ongoing dispute related to the Aravalli mountain range, expressing serious concern over continued illegal mining despite existing restrictions. Observing the gravity of the issue, the apex court issued sharp remarks to Rajasthan and other concerned states, warning that unchecked mining could lead to irreversible environmental damage.

During the hearing, the court examined the controversy surrounding the definition of “100-metre hills” in the Aravalli range. The bench noted that even after bans and regulatory directions, illegal mining activities are continuing in the Aravalli region, which could create conditions that may not be possible to rectify in the future.

The court cautioned that such activities pose a risk of irreparable harm to the fragile ecosystem, underlining the Aravalli range’s critical role in maintaining environmental balance, preventing desertification, and sustaining groundwater levels.

Direction to Form Independent Expert Committee

Taking a serious view of the matter, the Supreme Court directed the formation of an independent committee of subject experts to conduct a comprehensive examination of mining activities and their environmental impact in the Aravalli region.

The court instructed Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati and Amicus Curiae K. Parameshwar to suggest the names of experts within four weeks. The committee will be tasked with carrying out an in-depth study of mining operations, regulatory compliance, and ecological consequences across the Aravalli belt.

The matter has been listed for further hearing after four weeks, once the expert committee is constituted.

Background of the Aravalli Controversy

The dispute traces back to a Supreme Court order dated November 20, which permitted mining activities on hills below 100 metres in height. This order triggered widespread debate across the country over the interpretation of the “100-metre” definition, especially in regions covered by the Aravalli range.

In an earlier hearing, the court had issued notices to the Central Government and four Aravalli states—Rajasthan, Gujarat, Delhi and Haryana—seeking their responses on the issue and directing closer scrutiny of mining practices.

Crucial for Rajasthan

The outcome of the case holds special significance for Rajasthan, as nearly 80 per cent of the Aravalli mountain range lies within the state. Any judicial clarification or restriction will have a far-reaching impact on mining, environmental policy, and land use regulations in the region.

The Supreme Court’s strong observations signal a renewed judicial focus on environmental protection and sustainable development, particularly in ecologically sensitive zones such as the Aravalli range.