Supreme Court Denies Bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam; Imran Masood Raises Concerns

In a significant development in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, the Supreme Court of India has rejected the bail petitions of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. Following the ruling, Congress MP Imran Masood questioned the decision, emphasizing that prolonged detention of undertrial prisoners may constitute a violation of fundamental rights.

Speaking on the matter, Masood highlighted that the Supreme Court itself has repeatedly maintained that bail is the norm, and imprisonment is the exception. “It is crucial to consider whether keeping accused individuals in jail for extended periods before the completion of their trial infringes upon their fundamental rights,” he stated. He further emphasized that personal liberty forms the cornerstone of the Indian Constitution and should be carefully balanced in every judicial decision.

Masood described undertrial detention as a serious issue, arguing that holding a person in jail for years without a proven conviction goes against the principles of justice. While acknowledging the importance of national security and law enforcement, he warned against neglecting civil liberties.

The Supreme Court’s decision has reignited political debates. Opposition parties have criticized the ruling as harsh, while government supporters maintain that it aligns with legal procedures, considering the severity of the allegations and the ongoing investigation.

Legal experts note that the case underscores a broader concern—the delicate balance between individual freedom, fundamental rights, and national security. Although the Court has previously expressed concern over extended undertrial detention, provisions under stringent laws such as the UAPA impose stricter conditions for granting bail.