RPSC Former Member Raika Challenges HC Remarks in SI Recruitment 2021 Paper Leak Case

Jaipur: In the ongoing SI Recruitment-2021 paper leak case, former Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) member Ramuram Raika has challenged the observations made by a single bench of the High Court. Raika approached the division bench, contending that the remarks have adversely affected his decades-long impeccable career and reputation.

Highlights:

• Appeal against High Court remarks
• Raises concerns over damage to unblemished career
• Calls allegations unsubstantiated
• Petition filed before division bench

Raika submitted that the single bench’s comments were based on unverified allegations, negatively impacting his public image. He emphasized that these remarks have caused him mental distress, professional disrepute, and irreparable damage to his honor, despite the absence of any concrete evidence against him.

Allegations Called Unsubstantiated

The former RPSC member clarified that he was dragged into the case solely on the basis of allegations. According to him, no independent investigation, forensic analysis, or judicial proof has been presented in the matter. Raika argued that the single bench’s comments relied on hearsay and unverified information, which cannot form a basis for any finding of guilt.

Impeccable Tenure at RPSC

Raika highlighted his tenure at RPSC, stating that he served as a member from 14 July 2018 to 4 July 2022, during which his record remained spotless. He noted that no complaints were ever filed against him, nor was he subject to any inquiry or disciplinary action.

Emphasis on Transparency and Fairness

He further asserted that during his tenure, he consistently acted in the commission’s interest, ensuring transparency and fairness in all recruitment processes. Raika pointed out that he was associated with several selection procedures, yet no personal irregularities were ever proven against him.

Clarification on Selection of Children

Addressing remarks related to the selection of his children, son Devesh Raika and daughter Shobha Raika, he stated that their appointments were based entirely on merit, written examination, and interview performance. He denied any involvement in favoritism or manipulation. Raika argued that the observation in the court order suggesting a ‘shadow of doubt’ over their selection was circumstantial and not grounded in any independent judicial evidence. He maintained that it is unfair to question his reputation based on pending allegations.