Husband’s Tattoo Exposes His Lies: Indore Family Court Rejects Divorce Plea

Indore – In a dramatic turn of events inside a family courtroom, a husband’s attempt to secure divorce by accusing his wife of cruelty and hiding illness fell apart when a tattoo on his arm revealed more than he intended to show. The Indore Family Court dismissed his divorce petition after finding that the allegations were fabricated and that the husband himself had deserted his wife and child.

Tattoo Linked to Another Woman Exposes Husband’s Truth

During the hearing, the husband persistently tried to hide a tattoo on his arm under his sleeve. The wife’s lawyers argued that the tattoo was linked to another woman, indicating the husband’s extramarital involvement. When the judge instructed him to show the tattoo, he hesitated and avoided complying—raising suspicion and ultimately weakening his case.

Love Marriage in 2011, Then Harassment Begins

The case involves a mobile service businessman and his doctor wife who entered into a love marriage in January 2011. They later became parents to a child. According to the wife’s complaint, she faced harassment from her husband and in-laws for years. Being from a Scheduled Caste, she was allegedly forced to clean bathrooms, insulted for her skin condition (vitiligo), and pressured for ₹10 lakh as dowry.

Husband Left Family in 2017

Unable to bear the harassment, the wife moved to a separate house. However, in 2017, the husband abandoned her and their child, claiming he was leaving Indore. Later, it was discovered that he was still living in the city and associating closely with other women. When confronted, he retaliated by filing a divorce case in 2020, accusing his wife of cruelty and hiding her medical condition.

Wife’s Lawyers Present Strong Evidence

Advocates Krishna Kumar Kunhare and Dr. Rupali Rathore presented photographs from the wedding showing that the wife’s white patches were clearly visible, proving that no disease had been hidden. They also submitted images suggesting the husband’s relationships with other women.

Court Finds Husband at Fault

The husband’s evasive behavior regarding the tattoo and his inconsistent statements led the court to conclude that he was not truthful. The judge noted that:

• The wife had not committed any cruelty.
• The husband had deserted his family without cause.
• He could not take advantage of his own wrongdoing.

The court dismissed the divorce petition, calling it “fabricated and malicious.”

Clear Message from the Court

With all evidence examined thoroughly, the family court reinforced that false allegations and deceptive conduct cannot form the basis for dissolving a marriage. The ruling stands as a significant example of how truth eventually prevails—even if it’s hidden under a sleeve.