Rationale Behind Rahul Gandhi’s Absence During Vande Mataram Debate: Three Key Reasons

New Delhi: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi remained absent during the Lok Sabha’s marathon debate on Vande Mataram, sparking a major political stir. The BJP accused him of disrespecting India’s national heritage and constitutional traditions.

Rahul Gandhi’s Minimal Presence

Rahul Gandhi briefly appeared in the Parliament during the day but avoided participating in the debate. When questioned about his absence, he simply remarked:
“Just listen to my sister.”

Initially, the Congress party’s stance on this discussion was unclear. Senior leaders hinted that the party might completely stay away from the debate. Later, fearing political backlash, the party reconsidered its approach.

Three Main Reasons for Rahul Gandhi’s Absence

According to insiders cited by News18, Rahul Gandhi’s decision was influenced by three key factors:

1. Focus on Real Issues: He believed the debate was diverting attention from pressing national matters.
2. Upcoming Election Reforms: Rahul wanted to dedicate his full attention to discussions on electoral reforms scheduled in the near future.
3. Avoiding Controversy: He chose to stay away while the Prime Minister raised questions about the Nehru-Gandhi family, avoiding direct confrontation.

Internal Party Dynamics

Adding to Congress’ challenges, insiders revealed that MP Shashi Tharoor, reportedly at odds with some party leadership, was invited to a separate high-level meeting. Other Congress MPs were excluded, giving the BJP ammunition to question Rahul Gandhi’s claim that the government was deliberately keeping him away from key discussions. The matter even referenced a scheduled meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Potential Political Fallout

While the Congress maintains that the Vande Mataram debate was unnecessary, analysts believe Rahul Gandhi’s absence could have long-term political consequences. The impact may be felt not only in West Bengal but across the country, particularly as debates on constitutional symbols and political heritage intensify ahead of upcoming elections.