Supreme Court Rejects Proposal to Allow Dogs in Hospitals; Emphasizes Public Safety and Constitutional Balance

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday firmly rejected suggestions to allow dogs in hospitals, stating that such proposals are “far removed from reality.” The matter, heard in the context of stray dog issues, touches upon constitutional boundaries, public safety, and animal welfare.

Justice J. Mehta observed that permitting dogs in hospitals is not acceptable. The court also declined to investigate allegations of harassment of women dog feeders by alleged anti-feeder vigilantes, noting that such complaints are law and order issues. The next hearing in the case has been scheduled for Tuesday.

Arguments Presented
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued that the case is not merely about humans versus dogs but concerns the limits of constitutional powers. Representing the Dog Rights organization, Advocate Raj Shekhar Rao claimed that the CSV-R (Community Supported Vigilant Responsibility) model ensures safety, and dogs have already become part of institutional systems in several locations. He requested six months for institutions to implement solutions.

The court noted the risks highlighted by numerous videos on platforms such as YouTube, showing stray dogs attacking children and the elderly.

Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat suggested six measures, including:

• Keeping hospitals and main roads free of stray dogs
• Identifying feeders and feeding locations
• Timely implementation of ABC (Animal Birth Control) rules
• Addressing state infrastructure gaps
• Coordinating between municipal and state authorities
• Appointing responsible officers in every municipal area

Justice Mehta acknowledged that different stakeholders may have differing views but appreciated efforts to strike a balance. Senior Advocate Madhavi Diwan proposed the creation of an online dashboard at the state level to monitor and manage stray dog-related issues.

The Supreme Court’s observations highlight the judiciary’s focus on maintaining public safety while balancing animal welfare concerns.