
A young aspirant was denied a position in the Delhi Police due to allegations of violent behavior, despite having been acquitted earlier. After an eight-year legal struggle, the High Court has finally delivered a favorable verdict, paving the way for his appointment.
The Delhi Police Case
A young man from Haryana aspired to join the Delhi Police. However, his dream was initially derailed when he was allegedly labeled violent following a minor altercation. Undeterred, he approached the High Court seeking justice. After eight long years, the court has now ruled in his favor, ordering the police department to allow his joining.
The Case That Started in 2016
The matter dates back to September 2016, when Delhi Police issued a recruitment notification. The candidate applied and subsequently faced a report in October 2016 related to a brawl and communal disturbance. Despite this, he cleared the written test and completed the physical examination as part of the recruitment process.
Acquitted but Appointment Blocked
Prior to the completion of recruitment, the candidate had been acquitted of all charges related to the brawl. However, during the verification process, he was denied appointment on the grounds of alleged violent tendencies.
High Court Intervention
The aspirant approached the Delhi High Court, where Justices Madhu Jain and Naveen Chawla presided over the case. The bench observed that the candidate had met all the recruitment criteria and could not be denied appointment merely because of alleged violent behavior in the past.
“A Minor Altercation Is Not Indicative of Violence”
The court noted that the candidate had already been acquitted of the brawl and communal disturbance case. It emphasized that an isolated incident of a minor fight between two parties cannot be construed as evidence of a violent disposition. The judgment highlighted that such situations can occur occasionally and do not define a person’s overall character.
Joining Letter to Be Issued Retroactively
The High Court has directed the Delhi Police to issue the candidate’s joining letter effective from 2018. While the eight years’ salary will not be paid, all other benefits will be provided.
This verdict serves as an important precedent for candidates who are unjustly denied government jobs based on allegations lacking substantive evidence. It underlines that even if an FIR is filed, acquittal and fulfillment of recruitment criteria should ensure rightful employment.
Discover more from SD NEWS agency
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.